La Roche Posay Anthelios UVSPORT Pro-Resistance Stick SPF50+, with Mexoryl 400 & Vitamin E, All skin types and tones,10ml by La Roche-Posay
La Roche-Posay

La Roche Posay Anthelios UVSPORT Pro-Resistance Stick SPF50+, with Mexoryl 400 & Vitamin E, All skin types and tones,10ml

Sunscreens

99/100
No known risks

Pregnancy-focused rating

No higher-risk flags in the assessed ingredients. This is a screening result, not a guarantee of pregnancy safety.

16 of 19 ingredients rated3 not assessed

Is it suitable during pregnancy?

MamaSkin rates the recorded formula for La Roche Posay Anthelios UVSPORT Pro-Resistance Stick SPF50+, with Mexoryl 400 & Vitamin E, All skin types and tones,10ml as No known risks (99/100). This screening result is not a guarantee of safety for every pregnancy.

Why this rating?

No higher-risk ingredient flags are shown in the assessed entries. Ingredients without a matched rating are marked Not assessed, not No known risks.

16 of 19 ingredient entries on this page have a recorded score, evidence summary and source text. 3 entries do not have all of those fields. Unmatched or unrated entries are marked Not assessed in grey; missing evidence does not establish safety.

How we assess products

Ingredient breakdown

The recorded formula, with evidence behind each rating. Unmatched ingredients are marked Not assessed in grey.

Ingredient ratings and evidence

Higher-risk flags first. Open an ingredient for evidence.

20717943. Ricinus Communis Seed Oil/Castor Seed Oil

Not assessed

No matched ingredient rating is available yet. Not assessed does not mean safe or unsafe.

Cera Microcristallina/Microcrystalline Wax

Not assessed

No matched ingredient rating is available yet. Not assessed does not mean safe or unsafe.

Methoxypropylamino Cyclohexenylidene Ethoxyethylcyanoacetate

Not assessed

No matched ingredient rating is available yet. Not assessed does not mean safe or unsafe.

Isopropyl Palmitate

No known risks

This emollient ester improves slip and skin feel. Cosmetic Ingredient Review assessments support use in current cosmetic concentrations when formulated to be non-irritating; topical use is not identified as a pregnancy- or breastfeeding-specific concern. Some alkyl esters can increase penetration of other formula ingredients.

Sources: CIR: Safety Assessment of Alkyl Esters as Used in Cosmetics https://cir-safety.org/supplementaldoc/safety-assessment-alkyl-esters-used-cosmetics

Polyethylene

No known risks

Inert polymer used as a film former, thickener or texture ingredient in cosmetics. Normal topical use is expected to have low systemic exposure, with no pregnancy- or breastfeeding-specific concern identified in reviewed cosmetic references.

Sources: CIR cosmetic ingredient safety references for polyethylene and related polymers; EU CosIng / cosmetics regulatory inventory

Show all 19 ingredients

Isohexadecane

No known risks

Low-viscosity isoparaffin emollient used for slip and lightweight texture. Reviewed cosmetic safety sources support normal topical use, with no pregnancy- or breastfeeding-specific topical signal identified in the material reviewed.

Sources: CIR: Safety Assessment of Isoparaffins as Used in Cosmetics / CIR Quick Reference Table (Isohexadecane); EU CosIng / cosmetics regulatory inventory

Behenyl Behenate

No known risks

behenyl behenate is a cosmetic emollient, ester or lipid-derived formulation aid. Related safety assessments support normal cosmetic use, with irritation and penetration-enhancement qualifications retained where relevant. No pregnancy-specific concern was identified for ordinary topical exposure.

Sources: CIR safety assessments of fatty alcohols, glyceryl triesters and related cosmetic lipids https://www.cir-safety.org/sites/default/files/triglycerides_0.pdf; European Commission CosIng

Bis-ethylhexyloxyphenol Methoxyphenyl Triazine

No known risks

Modern broad-spectrum UV filter (often known as Tinosorb S). It has a high molecular weight and is formulated to remain mainly in the outer skin layers, with very low systemic absorption at cosmetic use levels. EU regulatory assessments and independent risk–benefit reviews have evaluated this filter as safe up to 10% in sunscreens, with no specific reproductive or developmental toxicity signals identified in animals or humans at permitted concentrations.

Sources: European Union Cosmetic Products Regulation (Annex VI): Bis-Ethylhexyloxyphenol Methoxyphenyl Triazine listed as an approved UV filter up to 10% in cosmetic products. Mikkelsen SH et al. “Survey and health assessment of UV filters” – Danish EPA, 2015: includes Bis-Ethylhexyloxyphenol Methoxyphenyl Triazine and notes low systemic exposure at approved use levels.

Ethylhexyl Triazone

No known risks

UV filter used in sunscreens and day products to help absorb UVB radiation. Reviewed cosmetic safety and regulatory sources support current cosmetic use within applicable concentration limits, with no pregnancy- or breastfeeding-specific topical concern identified in the material reviewed.

Sources: EU CosIng Annex VI / UV filters; EU scientific opinion on Ethylhexyl Triazone (Uvinul T 150)

Theobroma Cacao Seed Butter/Cocoa Seed Butter

No known risks

This plant-derived fatty oil or butter is used as an emollient and skin-conditioning ingredient. The Cosmetic Ingredient Review concluded that assessed plant-derived fatty acid oils are safe as used in cosmetics; individual plant allergy and ingredient purity remain practical considerations.

Sources: CIR: Safety Assessment of Plant-Derived Fatty Acid Oils https://cir-reports.cir-safety.org/view-attachment/?id=ad62ac6b-8e74-ec11-8943-0022482f06a6

Diethylamino Hydroxybenzoyl Hexyl Benzoate

No known risks

Modern UVA filter (often called Uvinul A+ or DHHB). Regulatory assessments have repeatedly evaluated this filter as safe in cosmetic products at concentrations up to 10%. The most recent SCCS advice focuses on controlling a manufacturing impurity (DnHexP) rather than on new toxicity of DHHB itself. Human biomonitoring data indicate low systemic exposure from normal sunscreen use, and current reviews do not identify specific reproductive or developmental toxicity signals at approved concentrations.

Sources: SCCP opinion referenced in Directive 2008/123/EC: concludes that Diethylamino Hydroxybenzoyl Hexyl Benzoate used at a maximum of 10% in cosmetic (including sunscreen) products does not pose a risk to the consumer. Regulatory summaries (e.g. CosLaw and CIRS Group updates, 2025) reviewing the SCCS DHHB opinion and reiterating that DHHB remains permitted up to 10% in EU cosmetics when impurity limits are respected.

Butyrospermum Parkii Butter/Shea Butter

No known risks

This label identifies shea butter, not a separate botanical active. CIR supports the reported cosmetic uses of shea butter in non-sensitising formulations. No pregnancy-specific harm has been identified from ordinary topical cosmetics; direct pregnancy data remain limited. This assessment excludes oral or medicinal preparations.

Sources: https://www.cir-safety.org/sites/default/files/shea092017final.pdf

Paraffin

No known risks

Highly refined hydrocarbon wax used as an occlusive/thickener. Cosmetic-grade paraffin has minimal skin absorption and no known pregnancy-specific concerns in topical use as intended. Concerns raised online typically relate to unrefined mineral oil impurities or dietary exposure, not cosmetic-grade topical use.

Sources: Cosmetic Ingredient Review (CIR), Safety Assessment of Fossil and Synthetic Waxes as Used in Cosmetics (2025); BfR, Highly refined mineral oils in cosmetics (2018). ; Petry et al. (2017) dermal penetration review.

Silica Silylate

No known risks

A surface-modified silica used to thicken oils and improve texture. Cosmetic safety reviewers concluded that silica silylate is safe in current practices when the final product is not irritating or sensitising to the respiratory tract. Avoid deliberately inhaling loose or airborne powder.

Sources: CIR: Safety Assessment of Silica Silylate, IJT 32(Suppl. 1), 2013; December 2025 Quick Reference Table https://cir-safety.org/sites/default/files/QRT-Update-Dec2025.pdf

Drometrizole Trisiloxane

No known risks

Organic UVA/UVB filter used in sunscreens, also known as Mexoryl XL. Cosmetic safety and regulatory sources support use within applicable concentration limits, with no pregnancy- or breastfeeding-specific topical concern identified in the sources reviewed.

Sources: EU CosIng Annex VI / UV filters; SCCS / European Commission cosmetic UV filter safety assessments; PubMed

Citric Acid

No known risks

pH adjuster used in small amounts to maintain product stability. Not associated with pregnancy-specific concerns.

Sources: Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (EU); European cosmetics regulatory framework

Glycine Soja Oil/Soybean Oil

No known risks

Exact formatting/common-name variant of glycine soja oil; it inherits the canonical scientific assessment. Plant-derived emollient oil used to soften skin and support formula texture. Reviewed cosmetic safety sources support current cosmetic use, with no pregnancy- or breastfeeding-specific topical concern identified in the material reviewed.

Sources: CIR: Safety Assessment of Soy-Derived Ingredients as Used in Cosmetics; EU CosIng / cosmetics regulatory inventory

Synthetic Wax

No known risks

Inert wax/structuring ingredient used to add body, stability and texture to cosmetics. Normal topical use is expected to have low systemic exposure, with no pregnancy- or breastfeeding-specific concern identified in reviewed cosmetic references.

Sources: CIR cosmetic ingredient safety references for waxes/structuring agents; EU CosIng / cosmetics regulatory inventory

Tocopherol.

No known risks

Vitamin E antioxidant used to protect oils and support the skin barrier. Not associated with pregnancy-specific concerns at cosmetic exposure.

Sources: Cosmetic Ingredient Review (US); Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (EU)

Full recorded ingredient list

20717943. Ricinus Communis Seed Oil/Castor Seed Oil, Isopropyl Palmitate, Polyethylene, Isohexadecane, Behenyl Behenate, Bis-ethylhexyloxyphenol Methoxyphenyl Triazine, Ethylhexyl Triazone, Theobroma Cacao Seed Butter/Cocoa Seed Butter, Diethylamino Hydroxybenzoyl Hexyl Benzoate, Butyrospermum Parkii Butter/Shea Butter, Paraffin, Cera Microcristallina/Microcrystalline Wax, Methoxypropylamino Cyclohexenylidene Ethoxyethylcyanoacetate, Silica Silylate, Drometrizole Trisiloxane, Citric Acid, Glycine Soja Oil/Soybean Oil, Synthetic Wax, Tocopherol.

Ingredient ratings refreshed 1 October 2026. Formulas vary by market and can change. Always compare with your packaging.

Questions about this assessment

Why does La Roche Posay Anthelios UVSPORT Pro-Resistance Stick SPF50+, with Mexoryl 400 & Vitamin E, All skin types and tones,10ml have a No known risks rating?

No higher-risk ingredient flags are shown in the assessed entries. Ingredients without a matched rating are marked Not assessed, not No known risks. Incomplete ingredient documentation does not establish safety; see the coverage answer and grey entries below.

Is the MamaSkin score a measure of SPF or sun protection?

No. The score and risk band describe MamaSkin's pregnancy-focused ingredient screening of this recorded formula. They do not measure SPF, UVA protection, water resistance or whether you have applied enough sunscreen. Use the protection and application instructions on your exact packaging, and review the ingredient flags separately.

Has every ingredient in La Roche Posay Anthelios UVSPORT Pro-Resistance Stick SPF50+, with Mexoryl 400 & Vitamin E, All skin types and tones,10ml been assessed?

16 of 19 ingredient entries on this page have a recorded score, evidence summary and source text. 3 entries do not have all of those fields. Unmatched or unrated entries are marked Not assessed in grey; missing evidence does not establish safety.

Does this assessment apply to my La Roche Posay Anthelios UVSPORT Pro-Resistance Stick SPF50+, with Mexoryl 400 & Vitamin E, All skin types and tones,10ml?

Only if the ingredient list on your packaging matches the recorded formula shown here. Formulas can differ by market and change over time. Compare the full list, not just the product name; report a mismatch if it differs.

Does this pregnancy assessment also establish breastfeeding suitability?

No. This page presents a pregnancy-focused product assessment. Do not infer a breastfeeding conclusion from its score or label; breastfeeding requires a separate assessment of the formula and how it is used.