
Aveeno

Body Washes
No higher-risk flags in the assessed ingredients. This is a screening result, not a guarantee of pregnancy safety.
18 of 18 ingredients rated
MamaSkin rates the recorded formula for Aveeno Calm + Restore Body Wash as No known risks (99/100). This screening result is not a guarantee of safety for every pregnancy.
No higher-risk ingredient flags are shown in the assessed entries. Ingredients without a matched rating are marked Not assessed, not No known risks.
18 of 18 ingredient entries on this page have a recorded score, evidence summary and source text. That describes documentation coverage, not proof that the finished formula has been clinically tested during pregnancy.
How we assess productsThe recorded formula, with evidence behind each rating. Unmatched ingredients are marked Not assessed in grey.
Water (Aqua) is the standard purified water used as a cosmetic solvent. It has no pregnancy-specific risk in normal topical use.
Sources: https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/Water, https://single-market-economy.ec.europa.eu/sectors/cosmetics/cosmetic-ingredient-database/cosing-glossary-ingredients_en
Mild amphoteric surfactant used in cleansers and shampoos to boost foam and reduce harshness. Reviewed cosmetic safety sources support present cosmetic use, with no pregnancy- or breastfeeding-specific topical signal identified; the main practical caveat is irritation or allergy in some users, sometimes linked to sensitising impurities.
Sources: CIR: Safety Assessment of Cocamidopropyl Betaine and Related Amidopropyl Betaines as Used in Cosmetics; EU CosIng / cosmetics regulatory inventory
Glycerin is a widely used humectant that supports hydration and the skin barrier, with a long safety record and no known pregnancy or breastfeeding concerns in topical cosmetic use.
Sources: CIR; EU/UK Cosmetics Regulation
A mild surfactant used for cleansing, foaming or formula stabilisation. The practical concern is formulation-dependent irritation, particularly in strong cleansers. No pregnancy-specific systemic concern was identified for normal topical or rinse-off exposure.
Sources: CIR safety assessments of alkyl betaines, amphoacetates, and dialkyl sulfosuccinate salts; European Commission CosIng ingredient inventory.
This glucose-derived nonionic surfactant or emulsifier is used in cleansers and emulsions. The Cosmetic Ingredient Review concluded that alkyl glucosides are safe in current cosmetic use when formulated to be non-irritating; sensitive skin can still react to surfactants.
Sources: CIR: Safety Assessment of Decyl Glucoside and Other Alkyl Glucosides as Used in Cosmetics https://cir-reports.cir-safety.org/view-attachment/?id=9810a771-8e74-ec11-8943-0022482f06a6
A large conditioning and film-forming polymer used mainly in hair and cleansing products. Cosmetic safety reviewers concluded that Polyquaternium-7 is safe in current cosmetic use at the reviewed concentrations. Its polymeric nature limits systemic exposure, and no pregnancy-specific concern is identified for normal topical use.
Sources: CIR: Safety Assessment of Polyquaternium-7, cited in the CIR Quick Reference Table https://www.cir-safety.org/sites/default/files/safe-092017posted122017.pdf
Panthenol (pro-vitamin B5) is used for soothing and barrier support and is generally well tolerated, with no known pregnancy or breastfeeding concerns in topical cosmetic use.
Sources: CIR; EU/UK Cosmetics Regulation
A glycerol and oleic-acid ester used as an emulsifier and skin-conditioning ingredient. Cosmetic safety assessments and its well-characterized metabolic components support current cosmetic use without a pregnancy- or breastfeeding-specific concern from normal topical exposure.
Sources: CIR: Amended Safety Assessment of Monoglyceryl Monoesters https://www.cir-safety.org/sites/default/files/monoglyceryl%20monoesters.pdf; CIR ingredient record: Glyceryl Oleate https://cir-safety.org/ingredient/glyceryl-oleate
Finely milled oat kernel material used for soothing, absorbency and skin conditioning. Cosmetic safety reviewers concluded that Avena sativa kernel flour is safe in current practices when formulated to be non-sensitising. People with oat sensitivity may still react, and loose powder should not be deliberately inhaled.
Sources: CIR: December 2025 Quick Reference Table, Avena Sativa (Oat) Kernel Flour conclusion, IJT 38(Suppl. 3), 2019 https://cir-safety.org/sites/default/files/QRT-Update-Dec2025.pdf
Botanical skin-conditioning ingredient used in soothing and hydrating formulas. Reviewed cosmetic safety sources support current cosmetic use provided anthraquinone levels do not exceed the limits addressed in the safety assessment; no pregnancy- or breastfeeding-specific topical concern was identified in the material reviewed.
Sources: CIR: Safety Assessment of Aloe-derived Ingredients as Used in Cosmetics; EU CosIng / cosmetics regulatory inventory
An oat kernel extract used for skin conditioning and soothing. Cosmetic safety reviewers concluded that Avena sativa kernel extract and most assessed oat-derived ingredients are safe in current practices of use and concentration when formulated to be non-sensitising and manufactured with appropriate impurity controls. Oat allergy or contact sensitivity can occur in susceptible people, but no pregnancy-specific concern was identified for normal topical cosmetic exposure.
Sources: CIR: Safety Assessment of Avena sativa (Oat)-Derived Ingredients as Used in Cosmetics https://cir-reports.cir-safety.org/view-attachment/?id=947dbaa1-8e74-ec11-8943-0022482f06a6
Sodium chloride is used to adjust viscosity and texture in formulations; topical cosmetic use is considered low concern with no known pregnancy or breastfeeding risks.
Sources: CIR; EU/UK Cosmetics Regulation
A modified starch used mainly to thicken and stabilize cosmetic formulas. Cosmetic safety reviewers concluded that starch phosphates, including hydroxypropyl starch phosphate, are safe in current cosmetic use. No pregnancy- or breastfeeding-specific concern is identified for normal topical exposure.
Sources: CIR: Safety Assessment of Starch Phosphates https://cir-safety.org/sites/default/files/FR_StarchPhosphates_092022.pdf
pH adjuster used in small amounts to maintain product stability. Not associated with pregnancy-specific concerns.
Sources: Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (EU); European cosmetics regulatory framework
Polymer thickener and stabiliser used in creams and sunscreens. Low systemic exposure expected.
Sources: Cosmetic Ingredient Review (US); Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (EU)
Preservative widely used in foods and cosmetics. Considered safe at regulated concentrations with low systemic exposure from topical use.
Sources: Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (EU); European cosmetics regulatory framework
pH adjuster used in very small quantities to balance formulations. Not associated with pregnancy-specific concerns.
Sources: Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (EU); European cosmetics regulatory framework
Disodium EDTA is a chelating agent used to improve formula stability and performance; it is considered low concern in topical cosmetic use, with no known pregnancy or breastfeeding risks at typical concentrations.
Sources: CIR; EU/UK Cosmetics Regulation
Water, Cocamidopropyl Betaine, Glycerin, Sodium Lauroamphoacetate, Coco-Glucoside, Polyquaternium-7, Panthenol, Glyceryl Oleate, Avena Sativa Kernel Flour, Aloe Barbadensis Leaf Extract, Avena Sativa Kernel Extract, Sodium Chloride, Hydroxypropyl Starch Phosphate, Citric Acid, Acrylates/C10-30 Alkyl Acrylate Crosspolymer, Sodium Benzoate, Sodium Hydroxide, Disodium EDTA
Ingredient ratings refreshed 1 October 2026. Formulas vary by market and can change. Always compare with your packaging.
No higher-risk ingredient flags are shown in the assessed entries. Ingredients without a matched rating are marked Not assessed, not No known risks. The product score is a stored assessment, not a clinical safety guarantee.
No. This recorded formula contains Panthenol or Madecassoside, but a barrier-care claim does not establish the assessment of all its other ingredients. Read the individual ingredient evidence and any manual-review explanation, and compare the recorded list with your packaging.
18 of 18 ingredient entries on this page have a recorded score, evidence summary and source text. That describes documentation coverage, not proof that the finished formula has been clinically tested during pregnancy.
Only if the ingredient list on your packaging matches the recorded formula shown here. Formulas can differ by market and change over time. Compare the full list, not just the product name; report a mismatch if it differs.
No. This page presents a pregnancy-focused product assessment. Do not infer a breastfeeding conclusion from its score or label; breastfeeding requires a separate assessment of the formula and how it is used.