Weleda Stretch Mark Body Butter 150ml by Weleda
Weleda

Weleda Stretch Mark Body Butter 150ml

BodyBody butter

Safety score

Pregnancy-focused assessment

Low Risk76/100
Higher concernLower concern

One or more ingredients have a low-risk flag in MamaSkin's current assessment. Review the notes and your own circumstances.

Formula and assessment check

Ingredient safety review updated 20 December 2025. Product formulas can change, so compare the ingredients shown here with the packaging you have.

Report a formula mismatch

MamaSkin assessment · 20 December 2025

Is Weleda Stretch Mark Body Butter 150ml suitable during pregnancy?

MamaSkin currently classifies Weleda Stretch Mark Body Butter 150ml as Low risk, with a stored score of 76/100. This is a precautionary classification, not an unqualified pregnancy-safe recommendation. Read the ingredient context and any manual-review explanation below.

What does the ingredient evidence show?

The recorded formula includes 2 ingredient entries with risk flags: Arnica Montana Flower Extract (Low risk), Fragrance (Parfum) (Low risk). These are ingredient-level flags; they do not replace the stored product assessment or account for every formulation detail.

24 of 26 ingredient entries on this page have a recorded score, evidence summary and source text. 2 entries do not have all of those fields. Unmatched entries retain the default No known risks label but are not independently assessed here; missing evidence does not establish safety.

Ingredient breakdown

See how the listed formula falls across MamaSkin's pregnancy-focused risk bands.

24

No known risks

2

Low risk

0

Medium risk

0

High risk

Ingredients

Ingredients with a higher risk flag appear first, followed by the rest of the formula.

Fragrance (Parfum)

Low Risk

An exact label variant for an undisclosed fragrance blend. Fragrance is not usually a pregnancy-specific concern at normal cosmetic levels, but the precise components and concentrations are not fully disclosed, so MamaSkin scores the umbrella term conservatively. People sensitive to fragrance may prefer fragrance-free products.

Sources: European Commission: Fragrance allergens labelling https://single-market-economy.ec.europa.eu/sectors/cosmetics/cosmetic-products-specific-topics/fragrance-allergens-labelling_en; IFRA Standards

Arnica Montana Flower Extract

Low Risk

Arnica flower extract is used topically in soothing products. Pregnancy safety has not been established for medicinal use, and arnica can cause allergic contact dermatitis; use on broken skin is discouraged. MamaSkin applies Low Risk for limited pregnancy data and sensitisation potential rather than a known fetal hazard from normal cosmetic exposure.

Sources: EMA: Arnica montana flower herbal monograph https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/herbal-monograph/final-community-herbal-monograph-arnica-montana-l-flos_en.pdf; CIR: Final Report on the Safety Assessment of Arnica Montana Extract and Arnica Montana https://cir-reports.cir-safety.org/view-attachment?id=d75e3329-8e74-ec11-8943-0022482f06a6.

Water (Aqua)

No Known Risks

Water (aqua) is the purified solvent used as the base of many cosmetics. MamaSkin classifies plain water as No known risks for normal topical use. Cosmetic water quality must be controlled to prevent contamination; this entry does not cover botanical waters or establish the safety of the finished formula.

Sources: Personal Care Products Council, CosmeticsInfo: Water https://www.cosmeticsinfo.org/ingredient/water/; FDA: Cosmetic Ingredient Names (Water/Aqua identity) https://www.fda.gov/cosmetics/cosmetics-labeling/cosmetic-ingredient-names

Show all (26)

Butyrospermum Parkii (Shea) Butter

No Known Risks

Plant-derived emollient widely used to moisturise skin. Long history of cosmetic use without pregnancy-specific safety concerns.

Sources: Cosmetic Ingredient Review (US); dermatology consensus

Glycerin

No Known Risks

Glycerin is a widely used humectant that supports hydration and the skin barrier, with a long safety record and no known pregnancy or breastfeeding concerns in topical cosmetic use.

Sources: CIR; EU/UK Cosmetics Regulation

Theobroma Cacao (Cocoa) Seed Butter

No Known Risks

A plant-derived fixed oil, butter or oil extract used as an emollient. Concerns focus on oxidation, irritation and source allergy; no pregnancy-specific hazard was identified for normal topical exposure.

Sources: CIR Safety Assessment of Plant-Derived Fatty Acid Oils; European Commission CosIng.

Simmondsia Chinensis (Jojoba) Seed Oil

No Known Risks

A liquid wax from jojoba seeds used as an emollient and conditioning ingredient. Cosmetic safety reviewers concluded that jojoba-derived ingredients, including jojoba seed oil or wax, are safe in current practices of use and concentration. No pregnancy-specific concern was identified for normal topical cosmetic exposure.

Sources: CIR: Final Report on the Safety Assessment of Jojoba Oil and Jojoba-Derived Ingredients https://cir-reports.cir-safety.org/view-attachment/?id=1f5fc8b6-8d74-ec11-8943-0022482f06a6

Helianthus Annuus (Sunflower) Seed Oil

No Known Risks

A plant-derived fatty oil or butter used mainly as an emollient, conditioning ingredient or texture agent. Cosmetic safety reviewers concluded that the assessed plant-derived fatty acid oils are safe in current practices of use and concentration. This conclusion applies to cosmetic-grade fixed oils rather than similarly named volatile essential oils. Seed or food allergy may still matter for a susceptible person.

Sources: CIR: Safety Assessment of Plant-Derived Fatty Acid Oils as Used in Cosmetics https://cir-reports.cir-safety.org/view-attachment/?id=ad62ac6b-8e74-ec11-8943-0022482f06a6

Behenyl Alcohol

No Known Risks

Long-chain fatty alcohol used as an emollient and thickener. This is not the same concern profile as simple drying alcohols; reviewed cosmetic safety sources support normal topical use.

Sources: CIR: Final Report on the Safety Assessment of Cetearyl Alcohol, Cetyl Alcohol, Isostearyl Alcohol, Myristyl Alcohol, and Behenyl Alcohol; EU CosIng / cosmetics regulatory inventory

Cetearyl Alcohol

No Known Risks

Fatty alcohol used as an emollient and thickener. Not the same as drying alcohols and not associated with pregnancy-specific concerns.

Sources: Cosmetic Ingredient Review (US); Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (EU)

Triticum Vulgare (Wheat) Germ Oil

No Known Risks

A plant-derived fatty oil or butter used mainly as an emollient, conditioning ingredient or texture agent. Cosmetic safety reviewers concluded that the assessed plant-derived fatty acid oils are safe in current practices of use and concentration. This conclusion applies to cosmetic-grade fixed oils rather than similarly named volatile essential oils. Seed or food allergy may still matter for a susceptible person.

Sources: CIR: Safety Assessment of Plant-Derived Fatty Acid Oils as Used in Cosmetics https://cir-reports.cir-safety.org/view-attachment/?id=ad62ac6b-8e74-ec11-8943-0022482f06a6

Pentylene Glycol

No Known Risks

Humectant and preservative booster. Considered safe for cosmetic use with low systemic exposure.

Sources: Cosmetic Ingredient Review (US); Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (EU)

Sodium Cetearyl Sulfate

No Known Risks

An anionic surfactant used for cleansing and emulsification. Cosmetic safety reviewers concluded that the assessed alkyl sulfates, including sodium cetearyl sulfate, are safe in current cosmetic practices. Irritation depends mainly on concentration, formula and contact time.

Sources: CIR: Safety Assessment of Alkyl Sulfates as Used in Cosmetics, IJT 29(Suppl. 2), 2010; December 2025 Quick Reference Table https://cir-safety.org/sites/default/files/QRT-Update-Dec2025.pdf

Centella Asiatica Flower/Leaf/Stem Extract

No Known Risks

centella asiatica flower/leaf/stem extract is a botanical-derived cosmetic conditioning ingredient. The reviewed identity is not an essential oil or an oral herbal preparation. Available cosmetic evidence and expected topical exposure did not identify a pregnancy-specific contraindication, although botanical irritation or allergy remains possible.

Sources: CIR ingredient-specific and botanical-family safety assessments; CIR Quick Reference Table https://cir-safety.org/sites/default/files/QRT-Update-Dec2025.pdf; European Commission CosIng

Crocus Chrysanthus Bulb Extract

No Known Risks

Betaine

No Known Risks

Betaine is a humectant/osmolyte used to support hydration and reduce irritation potential in formulas; it is considered low concern with no known pregnancy or breastfeeding risks in topical cosmetic use.

Sources: CIR; EU/UK Cosmetics Regulation

Acacia Senegal Gum

No Known Risks

A large plant-derived polysaccharide gum used as a binder and film former. The Cosmetic Ingredient Review reaffirmed it as safe in current cosmetic use. Rare allergy and control of pesticide or heavy-metal impurities remain practical considerations, but no pregnancy-specific concern is identified for normal topical exposure.

Sources: CIR: Amended Safety Assessment of Acacia Senegal Gum and Acacia Senegal Gum Extract https://www.cir-safety.org/supplementaldoc/amended-safety-assessment-acacia-senegal-gum-and-acacia-senegal-gum-extract-used-cos

Citric Acid

No Known Risks

pH adjuster used in small amounts to maintain product stability. Not associated with pregnancy-specific concerns.

Sources: Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (EU); European cosmetics regulatory framework

Glyceryl Caprylate

No Known Risks

Emollient, co-emulsifier and preservative-support ingredient used in topical cosmetics. Reviewed cosmetic ingredient references do not identify a pregnancy- or breastfeeding-specific concern for normal topical use.

Sources: CIR: Safety Assessment of Monoglyceryl Monoesters as Used in Cosmetics; EU CosIng / cosmetics regulatory inventory

Sodium Caproyl/Lauroyl Lactylate

No Known Risks

Limonene

No Known Risks

Limonene is a common fragrance component used at low levels in cosmetics; it is not a pregnancy-specific concern in topical use, but it is a recognised fragrance allergen and may trigger irritation or sensitisation in some people, especially if the product oxidises over time.

Sources: EU/UK cosmetics (fragrance allergen labelling); IFRA; toxicology reviews

Linalool

No Known Risks

Linalool is a common fragrance component used at low levels in cosmetics; it is not a pregnancy-specific concern in topical use, but it is a recognised fragrance allergen and may trigger irritation or sensitisation in some people, especially if the product oxidises over time.

Sources: EU/UK cosmetics (fragrance allergen labelling); IFRA; toxicology reviews

Citronellol

No Known Risks

A rose-like fragrance ingredient that occurs naturally in many essential oils and may also be manufactured. Its main cosmetic concern is contact allergy in susceptible users; no pregnancy-specific hazard is identified for normal topical cosmetic exposure.

Sources: European Commission: Fragrance allergens labelling https://single-market-economy.ec.europa.eu/sectors/cosmetics/cosmetic-products-specific-topics/fragrance-allergens-labelling_en; SCCS fragrance-allergen opinions

Geraniol

No Known Risks

A floral fragrance ingredient found in several essential oils and also used in manufactured form. It is a recognised contact allergen, but no pregnancy-specific hazard is identified for normal topical cosmetic exposure.

Sources: European Commission: Fragrance allergens labelling https://single-market-economy.ec.europa.eu/sectors/cosmetics/cosmetic-products-specific-topics/fragrance-allergens-labelling_en; SCCS fragrance-allergen opinions

Citral

No Known Risks

A lemon-scented mixture of the aldehydes geranial and neral used in fragrance. Citral is a recognised skin sensitiser, but current cosmetic concerns relate to allergy and concentration rather than a pregnancy-specific hazard from normal topical use.

Sources: European Commission: Fragrance allergens labelling https://single-market-economy.ec.europa.eu/sectors/cosmetics/cosmetic-products-specific-topics/fragrance-allergens-labelling_en; SCCS fragrance-allergen opinions

Farnesol

No Known Risks

A fragrance ingredient that also functions as a deodorant and occurs naturally in essential oils. It is a recognised contact allergen, but no pregnancy-specific hazard is identified for normal topical cosmetic exposure.

Sources: European Commission: Fragrance allergens labelling https://single-market-economy.ec.europa.eu/sectors/cosmetics/cosmetic-products-specific-topics/fragrance-allergens-labelling_en; SCCS fragrance-allergen opinions

Formulations can change without notice. For the most accurate result, compare this list with your packaging and scan the exact ingredient label in MamaSkin when you repurchase.

Questions about this assessment

Has every ingredient in Weleda Stretch Mark Body Butter 150ml been assessed?

24 of 26 ingredient entries on this page have a recorded score, evidence summary and source text. 2 entries do not have all of those fields. Unmatched entries retain the default No known risks label but are not independently assessed here; missing evidence does not establish safety.

Does this assessment apply to the Weleda Stretch Mark Body Butter 150ml I have?

Only if the ingredient list on your packaging matches the recorded formula shown here. Formulas can differ by market and change over time. Compare the full list, not just the product name; report a mismatch if it differs.

Does this pregnancy assessment also establish breastfeeding suitability?

No. This page presents a pregnancy-focused product assessment. Do not infer a breastfeeding conclusion from its score or label; breastfeeding requires a separate assessment of the formula and how it is used.

How to use this assessment

The risk band is the primary conclusion. The score adds detail within that band and should not be used to compare products as if a one-point difference were clinically meaningful.

MamaSkin provides pregnancy-focused information, not medical advice. Your midwife, GP, pharmacist or dermatologist should take priority when your circumstances differ from typical cosmetic use.

Read the full methodology