Palmer's Tummy Butter for Stretch Marks by Palmer's
Palmer's

Palmer's Tummy Butter for Stretch Marks

Body Care

Safety score

Pregnancy-focused assessment

Low Risk75/100
Higher concernLower concern

One or more ingredients have a low-risk flag in MamaSkin's current assessment. Review the notes and your own circumstances.

Formula and assessment check

Ingredient safety review updated 18 January 2026. Product formulas can change, so compare the ingredients shown here with the packaging you have.

Report a formula mismatch

Ingredient breakdown

See how the listed formula falls across MamaSkin's pregnancy-focused risk bands.

14

No known risks

2

Low risk

0

Medium risk

0

High risk

Ingredients

Ingredients with a higher risk flag appear first, followed by the rest of the formula.

Fragrance (Parfum)

Low Risk

An exact label variant for an undisclosed fragrance blend. Fragrance is not usually a pregnancy-specific concern at normal cosmetic levels, but the precise components and concentrations are not fully disclosed, so MamaSkin scores the umbrella term conservatively. People sensitive to fragrance may prefer fragrance-free products.

Sources: European Commission: Fragrance allergens labelling https://single-market-economy.ec.europa.eu/sectors/cosmetics/cosmetic-products-specific-topics/fragrance-allergens-labelling_en; IFRA Standards

Dimethicone

Low Risk

Dimethicone is a silicone polymer used as a skin protectant and slip/conditioning agent. It is considered inert with minimal dermal absorption; the main practical issues are cosmetic (feel) and occasional irritation in very sensitive users. It is not a pregnancy-specific concern in topical cosmetic use.

Sources: CIR: Amended Safety Assessment of Dimethicone, Methicone, and Substituted-Methicone Polymers as Used in Cosmetics https://cir-safety.org/supplementaldoc/amended-safety-assessment-dimethicone-methicone-and-substituted-methicone-polymers-2

Theobroma Cacao (Cocoa) Extract

No Known Risks
Show all (16)

Helianthus Annuus (Sunflower) Seed Oil

No Known Risks

A plant-derived fatty oil or butter used mainly as an emollient, conditioning ingredient or texture agent. Cosmetic safety reviewers concluded that the assessed plant-derived fatty acid oils are safe in current practices of use and concentration. This conclusion applies to cosmetic-grade fixed oils rather than similarly named volatile essential oils. Seed or food allergy may still matter for a susceptible person.

Sources: CIR: Safety Assessment of Plant-Derived Fatty Acid Oils as Used in Cosmetics https://cir-reports.cir-safety.org/view-attachment/?id=ad62ac6b-8e74-ec11-8943-0022482f06a6

Microcrystalline Wax (Cera Microcristallina)

No Known Risks

Highly refined mineral wax used to thicken and stabilise formulas. Cosmetic-grade microcrystalline wax has minimal skin absorption and no known pregnancy-specific concerns in topical use as intended. Concerns raised online typically relate to unrefined mineral oil impurities or dietary exposure, not cosmetic-grade topical use.

Sources: Cosmetic Ingredient Review (CIR) ingredient dossier for Microcrystalline Wax + CIR wax safety assessment materials. ; Petry et al. (2017) dermal penetration review (includes mineral oils/waxes). ; BfR, Highly refined mineral oils in cosmetics (context on refined mineral oil fractions/waxes in cosmetics) (2018).

Theobroma Cacao (Cocoa) Seed Butter

No Known Risks

A plant-derived fixed oil, butter or oil extract used as an emollient. Concerns focus on oxidation, irritation and source allergy; no pregnancy-specific hazard was identified for normal topical exposure.

Sources: CIR Safety Assessment of Plant-Derived Fatty Acid Oils; European Commission CosIng.

Prunus Amygdalus Dulcis (Sweet Almond) Oil

No Known Risks

Prunus Amygdalus Dulcis (Sweet Almond) Oil is a label variant for sweet almond-derived emollient oil used for skin conditioning and barrier feel. Normal topical cosmetic use has no known pregnancy- or breastfeeding-specific concern; users with almond or nut sensitivities should follow personal tolerance.

Sources: CIR: Safety Assessment of Plant-Derived Fatty Acid Oils as Used in Cosmetics; EU CosIng / cosmetics regulatory inventory

Butyrospermum Parkii (Shea) Butter

No Known Risks

Plant-derived emollient widely used to moisturise skin. Long history of cosmetic use without pregnancy-specific safety concerns.

Sources: Cosmetic Ingredient Review (US); dermatology consensus

Tocopherol (Natural Vitamin E)

No Known Risks

Vitamin E antioxidant used to protect oils and support the skin barrier. Not associated with pregnancy-specific concerns at cosmetic exposure.

Sources: Cosmetic Ingredient Review (US); Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (EU)

Tocopheryl Acetate

No Known Risks

Tocopheryl acetate (vitamin E derivative) is used as an antioxidant and skin-conditioning ingredient; it is considered low concern in topical use with no known pregnancy or breastfeeding risks at cosmetic concentrations.

Sources: CIR; EU/UK Cosmetics Regulation

Cocoyl Hydrolyzed Collagen

No Known Risks

cocoyl hydrolyzed collagen is a protein-, enzyme- or hydrolysate-derived cosmetic conditioning ingredient. Expected systemic exposure from normal topical use is low, and relevant family evidence did not identify a pregnancy-specific concern. Protein allergy and inhalation of loose enzyme or protein powder remain separate considerations.

Sources: CIR Safety Assessment of Animal- and Plant-Derived Amino Acids and Hydrolyzed Proteins https://cir-safety.org/panelbook/safety-assessment-animal-and-plant-derived-amino-acids-and-hydrolyzed-proteins-used-cosmet; European Commission CosIng ingredient inventory.

Cocoyl Hydrolyzed Elastin

No Known Risks

Argania Spinosa Kernel Oil

No Known Risks

Argan oil is a plant-derived emollient oil used for skin and hair conditioning. Normal topical cosmetic use has no known pregnancy- or breastfeeding-specific concern; users with plant/nut sensitivities should follow personal tolerance.

Sources: CIR: Safety Assessment of Plant-Derived Fatty Acid Oils as Used in Cosmetics; EU CosIng / cosmetics regulatory inventory

Centella Asiatica Extract

No Known Risks

Botanical skin-conditioning ingredient used in soothing and barrier-support formulas. Reviewed cosmetic safety sources support current cosmetic use when formulated to be non-sensitising, with no pregnancy- or breastfeeding-specific topical concern identified in the material reviewed.

Sources: CIR: Safety Assessment of Centella asiatica-derived Ingredients as Used in Cosmetics; EU CosIng / cosmetics regulatory inventory

Carthamus Tinctorius (Safflower) Seed Oil

No Known Risks

A plant-derived fatty oil or butter used mainly as an emollient, conditioning ingredient or texture agent. Cosmetic safety reviewers concluded that the assessed plant-derived fatty acid oils are safe in current practices of use and concentration. This conclusion applies to cosmetic-grade fixed oils rather than similarly named volatile essential oils. Seed or food allergy may still matter for a susceptible person.

Sources: CIR: Safety Assessment of Plant-Derived Fatty Acid Oils as Used in Cosmetics https://cir-reports.cir-safety.org/view-attachment/?id=ad62ac6b-8e74-ec11-8943-0022482f06a6

Xanthophylls

No Known Risks

xanthophylls is a cosmetic formulation or conditioning ingredient. Available identity, use and related safety evidence did not identify a pregnancy-specific concern for normal topical cosmetic exposure. This classification does not remove ordinary irritation or sensitivity precautions.

Sources: CIR ingredient and related-family assessments; European Commission CosIng; ECHA substance information where applicable

Formulations can change without notice. For the most accurate result, compare this list with your packaging and scan the exact ingredient label in MamaSkin when you repurchase.

How to use this assessment

The risk band is the primary conclusion. The score adds detail within that band and should not be used to compare products as if a one-point difference were clinically meaningful.

MamaSkin provides pregnancy-focused information, not medical advice. Your midwife, GP, pharmacist or dermatologist should take priority when your circumstances differ from typical cosmetic use.

Read the full methodology