Biore UV Aqua Rich Aqua Protect Lotion SPF 50+ PA++++ by Biore
Biore

Biore UV Aqua Rich Aqua Protect Lotion SPF 50+ PA++++

Sunscreens

Safety score

Pregnancy-focused assessment

Medium Risk53/100
Higher concernLower concern

This formula contains an ingredient that needs extra caution in MamaSkin's pregnancy-focused assessment.

Formula and assessment check

Ingredient safety review updated 15 February 2026. Product formulas can change, so compare the ingredients shown here with the packaging you have.

Report a formula mismatch

Ingredient breakdown

See how the listed formula falls across MamaSkin's pregnancy-focused risk bands.

19

No known risks

2

Low risk

2

Medium risk

0

High risk

Ingredients

Ingredients with a higher risk flag appear first, followed by the rest of the formula.

Ethylhexyl Methoxycinnamate

Medium Risk

Ethylhexyl methoxycinnamate (EHMC) is a UV-B filter (also called octinoxate/octyl methoxycinnamate). SCCS characterised EHMC as endocrine-active (oestrogenic activity and weak anti-androgenic activity in vitro and in vivo) and reviewed genotoxicity/reproductive toxicity datasets in its re-evaluation. Pregnancy-specific human outcome data for topical exposure are limited; the medium-risk signal is endocrine activity plus systemic exposure uncertainty with frequent, large-area use.

Sources: EU SCCS Opinion on Ethylhexyl Methoxycinnamate (EHMC) (SCCS/1671/24; sccs_o_294.pdf, final 26 Jun 2025).

BHT

Medium Risk

BHT (butylated hydroxytoluene) is a lipophilic antioxidant used to protect oils from oxidation. Animal studies at high (primarily oral) doses show liver enzyme induction and related biochemical changes; endocrine-screening lines of evidence have also been evaluated in regulatory reviews. Pregnancy-specific human outcome data for topical cosmetic exposure are limited; the key signal is systemic toxicology at higher exposures and uncertainty for pregnancy-specific outcomes.

Sources: EU SCCS Opinion on BHT (SCCS/1636/21; sccs_o_257.pdf, 2021); CIR: Safety Assessment of BHT as used in cosmetics.

Phenoxyethanol

Low Risk

Phenoxyethanol is a preservative permitted in EU cosmetics up to 1.0%. The SCCS concluded it is safe for cosmetic use at that level, including when considering higher cosmetic exposure scenarios in infants and young children. Main practical concern is irritation/stinging on very sensitive or compromised skin rather than a pregnancy- or breastfeeding-specific risk.

Sources: EU SCCS; EU Cosmetics Regulation (Annex V preservative limit), SCCS Opinion on Phenoxyethanol (SCCS/1575/16, 2016)

Show all (23)

Parfum

Low Risk

Umbrella term for an undisclosed fragrance blend. It’s not usually a pregnancy-specific concern at normal cosmetic use levels, but the exact components and concentrations aren’t fully disclosed on the label, so we score it more conservatively. If you prefer maximum transparency (or you’re sensitive to fragrance compounds), choose fragrance-free/unscented products.

Sources: EU/UK cosmetics (fragrance allergen labelling); IFRA

Water

No Known Risks

Alcohol

No Known Risks

Volatile solvent used in some toners, sprays, and lightweight formulas. Reviewed cosmetic safety sources support current cosmetic use, with no pregnancy- or breastfeeding-specific topical concern identified in the material reviewed; the main practical issue is dryness, stinging, or barrier disruption in some users.

Sources: CIR: Safety Assessment of SD Alcohol 40, Benzyl Alcohol, and Denatured Alcohol in Cosmetic Products; EU CosIng / cosmetics regulatory inventory

Glycerin

No Known Risks

Glycerin is a widely used humectant that supports hydration and the skin barrier, with a long safety record and no known pregnancy or breastfeeding concerns in topical cosmetic use.

Sources: CIR; EU/UK Cosmetics Regulation

Silica

No Known Risks

Mineral absorbent and texture aid used to mattify and improve slip. Reviewed cosmetic safety sources support normal topical cosmetic use; this assessment does not cover deliberate inhalation of loose powder.

Sources: CIR: Safety Assessment of Silica and Silicates as Used in Cosmetics; EU CosIng / cosmetics regulatory inventory

Ethylhexyl Triazone

No Known Risks

UV filter used in sunscreens and day products to help absorb UVB radiation. Reviewed cosmetic safety and regulatory sources support current cosmetic use within applicable concentration limits, with no pregnancy- or breastfeeding-specific topical concern identified in the material reviewed.

Sources: EU CosIng Annex VI / UV filters; EU scientific opinion on Ethylhexyl Triazone (Uvinul T 150)

Diethylamino Hydroxybenzoyl Hexyl Benzoate

No Known Risks

Modern UVA filter (often called Uvinul A+ or DHHB). Regulatory assessments have repeatedly evaluated this filter as safe in cosmetic products at concentrations up to 10%. The most recent SCCS advice focuses on controlling a manufacturing impurity (DnHexP) rather than on new toxicity of DHHB itself. Human biomonitoring data indicate low systemic exposure from normal sunscreen use, and current reviews do not identify specific reproductive or developmental toxicity signals at approved concentrations.

Sources: SCCP opinion referenced in Directive 2008/123/EC: concludes that Diethylamino Hydroxybenzoyl Hexyl Benzoate used at a maximum of 10% in cosmetic (including sunscreen) products does not pose a risk to the consumer. Regulatory summaries (e.g. CosLaw and CIRS Group updates, 2025) reviewing the SCCS DHHB opinion and reiterating that DHHB remains permitted up to 10% in EU cosmetics when impurity limits are respected.

Glyceryl Stearate

No Known Risks

Emulsifier and emollient used to stabilise creams and lotions. Not associated with pregnancy-specific concerns at cosmetic exposure.

Sources: Cosmetic Ingredient Review (US); Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (EU)

Bis-Ethylhexyloxyphenol Methoxyphenyl Triazine

No Known Risks

Modern broad-spectrum UV filter (often known as Tinosorb S). It has a high molecular weight and is formulated to remain mainly in the outer skin layers, with very low systemic absorption at cosmetic use levels. EU regulatory assessments and independent risk–benefit reviews have evaluated this filter as safe up to 10% in sunscreens, with no specific reproductive or developmental toxicity signals identified in animals or humans at permitted concentrations.

Sources: European Union Cosmetic Products Regulation (Annex VI): Bis-Ethylhexyloxyphenol Methoxyphenyl Triazine listed as an approved UV filter up to 10% in cosmetic products. Mikkelsen SH et al. “Survey and health assessment of UV filters” – Danish EPA, 2015: includes Bis-Ethylhexyloxyphenol Methoxyphenyl Triazine and notes low systemic exposure at approved use levels.

Dextrin Palmitate

No Known Risks

A plant-derived carbohydrate polymer or modified starch used to thicken, stabilise or condition a formula. Cosmetic safety reviewers concluded that the supported plant polysaccharide gums and derivatives are safe in current practices of use and concentration. Loose powders should still be used without deliberately inhaling airborne particles.

Sources: CIR: Safety Assessment of Plant Polysaccharide Gums as Used in Cosmetics https://www.cir-safety.org/panelbook/safety-assessment-plant-polysaccharide-gums-used-cosmetics

Agar

No Known Risks

A plant-derived polysaccharide used to thicken and stabilise formulas. Cosmetic safety reviewers concluded that agar is safe in current practices. Loose powder should not be deliberately inhaled.

Sources: CIR: Plant Polysaccharide Gums final assessment, September 2015; December 2025 Quick Reference Table https://cir-safety.org/sites/default/files/QRT-Update-Dec2025.pdf

Cellulose

No Known Risks

This cellulose or modified-cellulose polymer is used as a thickener, film former or stabilizer. Cosmetic Ingredient Review data indicate that cellulose polymers do not appreciably penetrate skin and are safe in current cosmetic use, with at most minimal irritation reported.

Sources: CIR: Amended Safety Assessment of Cellulose and Related Polymers as Used in Cosmetics https://cir-reports.cir-safety.org/view-attachment/?id=2e65c18f-8c74-ec11-8943-0022482f06a6

Polyvinyl Alcohol

No Known Risks

A synthetic film-forming polymer used in masks, makeup and hair products. Cosmetic safety reviewers concluded that polyvinyl alcohol is safe in current practices of use and concentration. Dermal absorption of the intact polymer is expected to be limited.

Sources: CIR: Safety Assessment of Polyvinyl Alcohol as Used in Cosmetics, final report December 2013 https://www.cir-safety.org/meeting/129th-cir-expert-panel-meeting

Acrylates/C10-30 Alkyl Acrylate Crosspolymer

No Known Risks

Polymer thickener and stabiliser used in creams and sunscreens. Low systemic exposure expected.

Sources: Cosmetic Ingredient Review (US); Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (EU)

Polysilicone-3

No Known Risks

Sodium Hydroxide

No Known Risks

pH adjuster used in very small quantities to balance formulations. Not associated with pregnancy-specific concerns.

Sources: Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (EU); European cosmetics regulatory framework

Royal Jelly Extract

No Known Risks

An extract of royal jelly used for skin conditioning; bee-product allergy can cause reactions in susceptible users. Allergy is the principal practical concern. No pregnancy- or breastfeeding-specific systemic hazard was identified for normal topical cosmetic exposure.

Sources: European Commission CosIng ingredient inventory; Cosmetic Ingredient Review botanical safety-assessment framework and relevant ingredient-family assessments. No ingredient-specific human pregnancy study of normal topical cosmetic use was identified.

Sodium Hyaluronate

No Known Risks

Sodium hyaluronate (hyaluronic acid salt) is used for hydration and cushioning, with very low systemic absorption from topical use and no known pregnancy or breastfeeding concerns at cosmetic concentrations.

Sources: CIR; EU/UK Cosmetics Regulation

Disodium EDTA

No Known Risks

Disodium EDTA is a chelating agent used to improve formula stability and performance; it is considered low concern in topical cosmetic use, with no known pregnancy or breastfeeding risks at typical concentrations.

Sources: CIR; EU/UK Cosmetics Regulation

EDTA

No Known Risks

Chelating agent (often listed as EDTA); minimal dermal absorption and no known pregnancy or breastfeeding risks at typical cosmetic concentrations.

Sources: CIR; EU/UK Cosmetics Regulation

Formulations can change without notice. For the most accurate result, compare this list with your packaging and scan the exact ingredient label in MamaSkin when you repurchase.

How to use this assessment

The risk band is the primary conclusion. The score adds detail within that band and should not be used to compare products as if a one-point difference were clinically meaningful.

MamaSkin provides pregnancy-focused information, not medical advice. Your midwife, GP, pharmacist or dermatologist should take priority when your circumstances differ from typical cosmetic use.

Read the full methodology