La Roche-Posay Anthelios Airlicium+ Fluid SPF 50 by La Roche-Posay
La Roche-Posay

La Roche-Posay Anthelios Airlicium+ Fluid SPF 50

Sunscreens

Safety score

Pregnancy-focused assessment

Medium Risk51/100
Higher concernLower concern

This formula contains an ingredient that needs extra caution in MamaSkin's pregnancy-focused assessment.

Formula and assessment check

Ingredient safety review updated 15 February 2026. Product formulas can change, so compare the ingredients shown here with the packaging you have.

Report a formula mismatch

MamaSkin assessment · 15 February 2026

Is La Roche-Posay Anthelios Airlicium+ Fluid SPF 50 suitable during pregnancy?

MamaSkin currently classifies La Roche-Posay Anthelios Airlicium+ Fluid SPF 50 as Medium risk, with a stored score of 51/100. This assessment flags concerns that need closer consideration. Review the explanation with a qualified healthcare professional before deciding whether to use this formula during pregnancy.

What does the ingredient evidence show?

The recorded formula includes 8 ingredient entries with risk flags: Ethylhexyl Salicylate (Low risk), Butyl Methoxydibenzoylmethane (Medium risk), Dimethicone (Low risk), plus others listed in the breakdown. These are ingredient-level flags; they do not replace the stored product assessment or account for every formulation detail.

45 of 45 ingredient entries on this page have a recorded score, evidence summary and source text. That describes documentation coverage, not proof that the finished formula has been clinically tested during pregnancy.

Ingredient breakdown

See how the listed formula falls across MamaSkin's pregnancy-focused risk bands.

37

No known risks

5

Low risk

3

Medium risk

0

High risk

Ingredients

Ingredients with a higher risk flag appear first, followed by the rest of the formula.

Butyl Methoxydibenzoylmethane

Medium Risk

Butyl methoxydibenzoylmethane (avobenzone) is a UVA filter used in sunscreens. Reviews note potential endocrine-related signals for several organic UV filters, but data are often not sufficient to establish endocrine disruption, and systemic exposure depends on formulation and use pattern. Pregnancy-specific human outcome data for topical exposure are limited; the key signal is uncertainty around systemic/endocrine effects rather than a well-defined pregnancy outcome dataset.

Sources: TGA: Safety review of seven active sunscreen ingredients https://www.tga.gov.au/resources/publication/corporate-reports/safety-review-seven-active-sunscreen-ingredients

Octocrylene

Medium Risk

Octocrylene is a UV filter and photostabiliser used in sunscreens and some daily SPF products. SCCS reviewed endocrine-related evidence and noted some indications of endocrine effects in vivo, but with limitations; systemic exposure is plausible with frequent, large-area use. An additional practical signal is that benzophenone can occur as an impurity/degradation product in some octocrylene-containing products. Pregnancy-specific human outcome data for topical exposure are limited.

Sources: SCCS/1627/21: Octocrylene https://health.ec.europa.eu/publications/octocrylene_en

BHT

Medium Risk

BHT (butylated hydroxytoluene) is a lipophilic antioxidant used to protect oils from oxidation. Animal studies at high (primarily oral) doses show liver enzyme induction and related biochemical changes; endocrine-screening lines of evidence have also been evaluated in regulatory reviews. Pregnancy-specific human outcome data for topical cosmetic exposure are limited; the key signal is systemic toxicology at higher exposures and uncertainty for pregnancy-specific outcomes.

Sources: SCCS/1636/21: Butylated hydroxytoluene https://health.ec.europa.eu/publications/butylated-hydroxytoluene-bht_en

Show all (45)

Ethylhexyl Salicylate

Low Risk

Ethylhexyl salicylate (octisalate) is an organic UV-B filter with measurable topical absorption. A CIR review records a rat oral reproductive/developmental study with dose-related post-implantation loss and smaller litters at 80 and 250 mg/kg/day (NOAEL 25 mg/kg/day); those repeated oral doses do not model intact-skin cosmetic exposure. The same review found relatively low human-skin permeability and concluded ethylhexyl salicylate safe in the assessed cosmetic uses. A ToxCast-to-human-exposure comparison found the most sensitive in-vitro endocrine response at about 16.5 micromolar versus about 0.023 micromolar maximal-use human plasma exposure, roughly 700-fold lower. FDA still requests additional sunscreen safety data, and pregnancy-outcome data are limited; MotherToBaby reports no proven increased pregnancy risk. MamaSkin therefore uses Low Risk to surface absorption and the evidence gap without treating remote high-dose animal findings as proof that typical topical use should be avoided.

Sources: CIR 2019 Final Report: Amended Safety Assessment of Salicylic Acid and Salicylates https://www.cir-safety.org/sites/default/files/salicy042019FAR.pdf, Toxicological Sciences 2023: ToxCast/Tox21 endocrine activity compared with human plasma exposure https://academic.oup.com/toxsci/article/196/1/25/7240499, FDA: OTC sunscreen proposed-order Q&A https://www.fda.gov/drugs/understanding-over-counter-medicines/questions-and-answers-fda-posts-deemed-final-order-and-proposed-order-over-counter-sunscreen, Matta et al. JAMA 2020 maximal-use sunscreen absorption trial https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2759002, MotherToBaby: Screening Your Sunscreen During Pregnancy https://mothertobaby.org/baby-blog/screening-your-sunscreen-during-pregnancy/

Triethanolamine

Low Risk

Triethanolamine (TEA) is an alkanolamine used as a pH adjuster and surfactant in cosmetics. The main practical concerns are skin/eye irritation at higher concentrations and the potential formation of nitrosamines if formulated with nitrosating agents (a formulation/impurity-control issue). It is not a typical pregnancy-specific concern at cosmetic use levels; overall risk is primarily local irritation/sensitisation in susceptible users.

Sources: CIR: Triethanolamine ingredient safety information https://www.cir-safety.org/ingredient/triethanolamine

Phenoxyethanol

Low Risk

Phenoxyethanol is a preservative permitted in EU cosmetics up to 1.0%. The SCCS concluded it is safe for cosmetic use at that level, including when considering higher cosmetic exposure scenarios in infants and young children. Main practical concern is irritation/stinging on very sensitive or compromised skin rather than a pregnancy- or breastfeeding-specific risk.

Sources: SCCS/1575/16: Phenoxyethanol opinion https://health.ec.europa.eu/publications/phenoxyethanol_en

Parfum

Low Risk

Umbrella term for an undisclosed fragrance blend. It’s not usually a pregnancy-specific concern at normal cosmetic use levels, but the exact components and concentrations aren’t fully disclosed on the label, so we score it more conservatively. If you prefer maximum transparency (or you’re sensitive to fragrance compounds), choose fragrance-free/unscented products.

Sources: SCCS: Fragrance allergens in cosmetic products https://health.ec.europa.eu/latest-updates/sccs-new-opinion-fragrance-allergens-cosmetic-products-2012-07-31_en

Dimethicone

Low Risk

Dimethicone is a silicone polymer used as a skin protectant and slip/conditioning agent. It is considered inert with minimal dermal absorption; the main practical issues are cosmetic (feel) and occasional irritation in very sensitive users. It is not a pregnancy-specific concern in topical cosmetic use.

Sources: CIR: Amended Safety Assessment of Dimethicone, Methicone, and Substituted-Methicone Polymers as Used in Cosmetics https://cir-safety.org/supplementaldoc/amended-safety-assessment-dimethicone-methicone-and-substituted-methicone-polymers-2

Water

No Known Risks

Water (Aqua) is the standard purified water used as a cosmetic solvent. It has no pregnancy-specific risk in normal topical use.

Sources: https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/Water, https://single-market-economy.ec.europa.eu/sectors/cosmetics/cosmetic-ingredient-database/cosing-glossary-ingredients_en

Titanium Dioxide

No Known Risks

Inorganic mineral pigment and, in some products, a mineral UV filter. For typical topical use in creams, lotions and makeup, systemic absorption is expected to be very low. Most concerns discussed in the literature relate to ingestion (food additive E171) or inhalation exposure from fine powders/sprays, and to specific nanoparticle characterisation. For routine topical cosmetic use, it is generally considered acceptable in pregnancy and breastfeeding; if you prefer a cautious approach, avoid inhaling loose powders or sprays.

Sources: EFSA opinion on titanium dioxide as food additive E171 (ingestion context); SCCS opinions on titanium dioxide in cosmetics (including inhalation/nano considerations); general dermatology guidance on mineral sunscreens in pregnancy.

C12-15 Alkyl Benzoate

No Known Risks

Alkyl benzoate emollient used in cosmetics; available cosmetic safety assessments do not indicate pregnancy-specific concerns with routine topical use.

Sources: CIR Safety Assessment of Alkyl Benzoates (2012); CIR alkyl benzoates dossier / C12-15 alkyl benzoate data.

Silica

No Known Risks

Mineral absorbent and texture aid used to mattify and improve slip. Reviewed cosmetic safety sources support normal topical cosmetic use; this assessment does not cover deliberate inhalation of loose powder.

Sources: CIR: Safety Assessment of Silica and Silicates as Used in Cosmetics; EU CosIng / cosmetics regulatory inventory

Bis-Ethylhexyloxyphenol Methoxyphenyl Triazine

No Known Risks

Modern broad-spectrum UV filter (often known as Tinosorb S). It has a high molecular weight and is formulated to remain mainly in the outer skin layers, with very low systemic absorption at cosmetic use levels. EU regulatory assessments and independent risk–benefit reviews have evaluated this filter as safe up to 10% in sunscreens, with no specific reproductive or developmental toxicity signals identified in animals or humans at permitted concentrations.

Sources: European Union Cosmetic Products Regulation (Annex VI): Bis-Ethylhexyloxyphenol Methoxyphenyl Triazine listed as an approved UV filter up to 10% in cosmetic products. Mikkelsen SH et al. “Survey and health assessment of UV filters” – Danish EPA, 2015: includes Bis-Ethylhexyloxyphenol Methoxyphenyl Triazine and notes low systemic exposure at approved use levels.

Ethylhexyl Triazone

No Known Risks

UV filter used in sunscreens and day products to help absorb UVB radiation. Reviewed cosmetic safety and regulatory sources support current cosmetic use within applicable concentration limits, with no pregnancy- or breastfeeding-specific topical concern identified in the material reviewed.

Sources: EU CosIng Annex VI / UV filters; EU scientific opinion on Ethylhexyl Triazone (Uvinul T 150)

Glycerin

No Known Risks

Glycerin is a widely used humectant that supports hydration and the skin barrier, with a long safety record and no known pregnancy or breastfeeding concerns in topical cosmetic use.

Sources: CIR; EU/UK Cosmetics Regulation

Pentylene Glycol

No Known Risks

Humectant and preservative booster. Considered safe for cosmetic use with low systemic exposure.

Sources: Cosmetic Ingredient Review (US); Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (EU)

Aluminum Starch Octenylsuccinate

No Known Risks

A modified starch used to absorb oil, improve texture and reduce greasiness. Cosmetic safety reviewers concluded that aluminum starch octenylsuccinate is safe as used. Earlier inhalation uncertainty was addressed by particle-size information indicating that the cosmetic ingredient is not expected to be respirable; loose powders and sprays should nevertheless be used without deliberately inhaling them. No pregnancy-specific concern was identified for normal cosmetic exposure.

Sources: CIR: Amended Safety Assessment of Aluminum Starch Octenylsuccinate https://www.cir-safety.org/panelbook/amended-safety-assessment-aluminum-starch-octenylsuccinate-used-cosmetics; CIR assessment history and conclusion https://www.cir-safety.org/sites/default/files/polysaccharide%20octenylsuccinates.pdf

Stearic Acid

No Known Risks

Stearic acid is a fatty acid used to stabilise emulsions and improve texture; it is considered low concern in topical cosmetics with no known pregnancy or breastfeeding risks at typical concentrations.

Sources: CIR; EU/UK Cosmetics Regulation

Potassium Cetyl Phosphate

No Known Risks

An alkyl phosphate surfactant and emulsifier used to stabilise creams, sunscreens and makeup. Cosmetic safety reviewers concluded that the assessed alkyl phosphates, including potassium cetyl phosphate, are safe in current practices of use and concentration when formulated to be non-irritating. Dermal penetration is expected to be limited, and no pregnancy-specific concern is identified for normal topical cosmetic exposure.

Sources: CIR: Safety Assessment of Alkyl Phosphates https://www.cir-safety.org/sites/default/files/alkyl%20phosphates_0.pdf

Methyl Methacrylate Crosspolymer

No Known Risks

A large, pre-formed acrylic polymer used for texture, film formation and oil absorption. Cosmetic safety reviewers concluded that methyl methacrylate crosspolymer is safe in current cosmetic use, based partly on the safety of closely characterized PMMA medical materials. Good manufacturing practice should minimize residual monomer.

Sources: CIR: Safety Assessment of Polymethyl Methacrylate and Related Polymers https://www.cir-safety.org/sites/default/files/115_final_pmma.pdf

Methylene Bis-Benzotriazolyl Tetramethylbutylphenol

No Known Risks

Hybrid particulate UV filter (often referred to as Tinosorb M or Bisoctrizole). It behaves more like an inorganic, microfine filter, forming a film on the skin surface with minimal percutaneous absorption. EU Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (SCCS) opinions on both conventional and nano forms support its safe use in dermally applied cosmetic products up to 10% under current conditions of use, with main caution relating to inhalation of spray products rather than systemic toxicity from normal topical application.

Sources: SCCS opinions on Methylene Bis-Benzotriazolyl Tetramethylbutylphenol (MBBT), including SCCS/1460/11 and SCCS/1546/15: conclude that MBBT used as a UV filter up to 10% in dermal cosmetic products is safe under the evaluated conditions of use. European Commission, revision opinion on Methylene Bis-Benzotriazolyl Tetramethylbutylphenol (nano form), 2015: confirms safety of nano MBBT up to 10% in dermally applied cosmetics when used according to specified conditions

Nylon-12

No Known Risks

A large polyamide powder used for slip, texture and oil absorption. Cosmetic safety reviewers concluded that Nylon-12 is safe in current cosmetic use; human testing at the maximum reviewed concentration did not indicate irritation or sensitization. Avoid deliberately inhaling loose powder or using it through an airbrush system.

Sources: CIR: Safety Assessment of Nylon Polymers https://cir-safety.org/sites/default/files/nylon_build.pdf; CIR findings announcement https://www.cir-safety.org/sites/default/files/March%20postmeeting%20announcement%20-revised.pdf

Propylene Glycol

No Known Risks

Propylene glycol is a common solvent and humectant with a long history of use; it is not considered a pregnancy or breastfeeding concern in topical cosmetics, though some individuals may experience irritation in leave-on products.

Sources: CIR; EU/UK Cosmetics Regulation

Synthetic Wax

No Known Risks

Inert wax/structuring ingredient used to add body, stability and texture to cosmetics. Normal topical use is expected to have low systemic exposure, with no pregnancy- or breastfeeding-specific concern identified in reviewed cosmetic references.

Sources: CIR cosmetic ingredient safety references for waxes/structuring agents; EU CosIng / cosmetics regulatory inventory

Terephthalylidene Dicamphor Sulfonic Acid

No Known Risks

Organic UVA filter used in sunscreens, also known as Ecamsule or Mexoryl SX. Cosmetic safety and regulatory sources support use within applicable concentration limits, with no pregnancy- or breastfeeding-specific topical concern identified in the sources reviewed.

Sources: EU CosIng Annex VI / UV filters; SCCS / European Commission cosmetic UV filter safety assessments; PubMed

Palmitic Acid

No Known Risks

Fatty acid used as an emollient, cleansing-support and texture ingredient. It is not associated with pregnancy- or breastfeeding-specific concerns in normal topical cosmetic use.

Sources: CIR: Safety Assessment of Fatty Acids and Fatty Acid Salts as Used in Cosmetics; EU CosIng / cosmetics regulatory inventory

PEG-100 Stearate

No Known Risks

Emulsifier used to stabilize creams and lotions. Reviewed cosmetic safety sources support use of PEG stearates in cosmetics, with no pregnancy- or breastfeeding-specific concern identified for normal topical use.

Sources: CIR: Safety Assessment of PEG Stearates as Used in Cosmetics; EU CosIng / cosmetics regulatory inventory

Glyceryl Stearate

No Known Risks

Emulsifier and emollient used to stabilise creams and lotions. Not associated with pregnancy-specific concerns at cosmetic exposure.

Sources: Cosmetic Ingredient Review (US); Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (EU)

Silica Silylate

No Known Risks

A surface-modified silica used to thicken oils and improve texture. Cosmetic safety reviewers concluded that silica silylate is safe in current practices when the final product is not irritating or sensitising to the respiratory tract. Avoid deliberately inhaling loose or airborne powder.

Sources: CIR: Safety Assessment of Silica Silylate, IJT 32(Suppl. 1), 2013; December 2025 Quick Reference Table https://cir-safety.org/sites/default/files/QRT-Update-Dec2025.pdf

Drometrizole Trisiloxane

No Known Risks

Organic UVA/UVB filter used in sunscreens, also known as Mexoryl XL. Cosmetic safety and regulatory sources support use within applicable concentration limits, with no pregnancy- or breastfeeding-specific topical concern identified in the sources reviewed.

Sources: EU CosIng Annex VI / UV filters; SCCS / European Commission cosmetic UV filter safety assessments; PubMed

Ammonium Polyacryloyldimethyl Taurate

No Known Risks

A high-molecular-weight polymer used to thicken and stabilise formulas. Cosmetic safety reviewers concluded that acryloyldimethyltaurate polymers are safe in current cosmetic practices. Absorption of the finished polymer is expected to be limited, with residual monomers controlled during manufacture.

Sources: CIR: Safety Assessment of Acryloyldimethyltaurate Polymers as Used in Cosmetics; final report April 2017 https://cir-safety.org/sites/default/files/QRT-Update-Dec2025.pdf

Isopropyl Lauroyl Sarcosinate

No Known Risks

A cosmetic functional ingredient used for conditioning, texture or formula support. Available cosmetic-use information did not identify a reproductive or developmental hazard from normal topical exposure.

Sources: European Commission CosIng ingredient inventory; relevant CIR cosmetic safety assessments and peer-reviewed cosmetic-use literature.

Poloxamer 338

No Known Risks

poloxamer 338 is a cosmetic polymer or polymeric formulation aid. The reviewed material is distinct from any free reactive monomers; systemic dermal absorption is expected to be limited by molecular size when manufactured with appropriate impurity controls. No pregnancy-specific concern was identified for normal cosmetic use, although products should be formulated to avoid irritation.

Sources: CIR polymer safety assessments and Quick Reference Table https://cir-safety.org/sites/default/files/QRT-Update-Dec2025.pdf; European Commission CosIng ingredient inventory

Aluminum Hydroxide

No Known Risks

Mineral opacifier, absorbent and pigment-coating ingredient used in makeup, sunscreens and skin care. Low systemic exposure is expected from normal topical cosmetic use, with no pregnancy- or breastfeeding-specific concern identified in reviewed cosmetic references.

Sources: CIR cosmetic ingredient safety references for alumina/aluminum hydroxide ingredients; EU CosIng / cosmetics regulatory inventory

Stearyl Alcohol

No Known Risks

Fatty alcohol used as an emollient and stabiliser. Not associated with pregnancy-specific concerns at cosmetic exposure.

Sources: Cosmetic Ingredient Review (US); Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (EU)

Tocopherol

No Known Risks

Vitamin E antioxidant used to protect oils and support the skin barrier. Not associated with pregnancy-specific concerns at cosmetic exposure.

Sources: Cosmetic Ingredient Review (US); Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (EU)

Caprylyl Glycol

No Known Risks

Humectant and preservative booster used to support product stability. Low systemic exposure expected from topical cosmetic use.

Sources: Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (EU); Cosmetic Ingredient Review (US)

Polyglyceryl-10 Laurate

No Known Risks

Polyglycerin fatty-acid ester used as an emulsifier and solubilizer. Reviewed cosmetic safety references do not identify a pregnancy- or breastfeeding-specific concern for normal topical cosmetic use.

Sources: CIR cosmetic ingredient safety references for polyglyceryl fatty acid esters; EU CosIng / cosmetics regulatory inventory

Butylene Glycol

No Known Risks

Solvent and humectant commonly used in leave-on products. Not associated with pregnancy-specific concerns at cosmetic exposure levels.

Sources: Cosmetic Ingredient Review (US); Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (EU)

Disodium EDTA

No Known Risks

Disodium EDTA is a chelating agent used to improve formula stability and performance; it is considered low concern in topical cosmetic use, with no known pregnancy or breastfeeding risks at typical concentrations.

Sources: CIR; EU/UK Cosmetics Regulation

Hydroxypropyl Methylcellulose

No Known Risks

This cellulose or modified-cellulose polymer is used as a thickener, film former or stabilizer. Cosmetic Ingredient Review data indicate that cellulose polymers do not appreciably penetrate skin and are safe in current cosmetic use, with at most minimal irritation reported.

Sources: CIR: Amended Safety Assessment of Cellulose and Related Polymers as Used in Cosmetics https://cir-reports.cir-safety.org/view-attachment/?id=2e65c18f-8c74-ec11-8943-0022482f06a6

Myristic Acid

No Known Risks

This naturally occurring fatty acid is used for emolliency, cleansing support or texture. The Cosmetic Ingredient Review concluded that assessed fatty acids are safe in current cosmetic use when formulated to be non-irritating and non-sensitizing; some can increase penetration of other formula ingredients.

Sources: CIR: Safety Assessment of Fatty Acids and Fatty Acid Salts as Used in Cosmetics https://cir-safety.org/supplementaldoc/safety-assessment-fatty-acids-fatty-acid-salts-used-cosmetic

Sodium Chloride

No Known Risks

Sodium chloride is used to adjust viscosity and texture in formulations; topical cosmetic use is considered low concern with no known pregnancy or breastfeeding risks.

Sources: CIR; EU/UK Cosmetics Regulation

Benzyl Benzoate

No Known Risks

A fragrance ingredient, solvent and fixative that also occurs naturally in some essential oils. It is a labelled fragrance allergen and may irritate or sensitise susceptible users, but no pregnancy-specific concern is identified for normal topical cosmetic exposure.

Sources: European Commission: Fragrance allergens labelling https://single-market-economy.ec.europa.eu/sectors/cosmetics/cosmetic-products-specific-topics/fragrance-allergens-labelling_en; SCCS fragrance-allergen opinions

Benzyl Alcohol

No Known Risks

Benzyl alcohol is used as a preservative and fragrance component in cosmetics; it is not a pregnancy-specific concern at typical topical exposure, but it can be irritating or sensitising for some individuals, particularly in leave-on products.

Sources: CIR; EU/UK Cosmetics Regulation; toxicology reviews

Formulations can change without notice. For the most accurate result, compare this list with your packaging and scan the exact ingredient label in MamaSkin when you repurchase.

Questions about this assessment

Has every ingredient in La Roche-Posay Anthelios Airlicium+ Fluid SPF 50 been assessed?

45 of 45 ingredient entries on this page have a recorded score, evidence summary and source text. That describes documentation coverage, not proof that the finished formula has been clinically tested during pregnancy.

Does this assessment apply to the La Roche-Posay Anthelios Airlicium+ Fluid SPF 50 I have?

Only if the ingredient list on your packaging matches the recorded formula shown here. Formulas can differ by market and change over time. Compare the full list, not just the product name; report a mismatch if it differs.

Does this pregnancy assessment also establish breastfeeding suitability?

No. This page presents a pregnancy-focused product assessment. Do not infer a breastfeeding conclusion from its score or label; breastfeeding requires a separate assessment of the formula and how it is used.

How to use this assessment

The risk band is the primary conclusion. The score adds detail within that band and should not be used to compare products as if a one-point difference were clinically meaningful.

MamaSkin provides pregnancy-focused information, not medical advice. Your midwife, GP, pharmacist or dermatologist should take priority when your circumstances differ from typical cosmetic use.

Read the full methodology